Hady Habib vs Mika Brunold Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the performance of Habib and Brunold in the past six months reveals insightful comparisons for their upcoming tennis match. Habib has a slightly superior record on second serve points, winning 49.93%, while Brunold trails with 40.33%. This statistic strongly correlates with match prediction accuracy, highlighting a potential advantage for Habib.

In terms of return game performance, Brunold has been more effective against second serves, claiming 47.54% of such points, compared to Habib’s 45.78%. However, Habib lags behind significantly on first serve returns, at 18.17%, when compared to Brunold's impressive 27.33%. These figures suggest Brunold might have an edge in breaking serves, a crucial factor in head-to-head matchups.

Under pressure, Habib demonstrates resilience, saving 67.2% of breakpoints, a stark contrast to Brunold’s 48.85% saving rate. This could be a decisive factor in high-pressure moments during the match. Over the past year, Brunold displays a higher match win percentage of 67.11% alongside a win-loss record of 51/25. In comparison, Habib's win percentage stands at 56.72% with a record of 38/29, providing an overarching view of their capabilities over this period.

Surface proficiency adds another layer of complexity to the prediction. Habib excels on Hard courts with a 68% success rate, whereas Brunold’s prime performance is on Clay, achieving 61%. Conversely, both players have shown weaker performance on Indoor Hard, with Habib at 49% and Brunold on Hard courts at a modest 44%.

Assessing their performance at the Challengers/ITF tournaments greater than $10K, Brunold showcases a slightly higher win rate of 61.54% compared to Habib’s 58.33%. Although both have primarily competed at similar event levels, the quality of opponents varies—with Habib facing tougher competition, averaging an opponent rank of 195.61, versus Brunold’s 403.05.

Deciding set statistics reveal Habib's proficiency, winning 64% of such sets, whereas Brunold has won just 38% in the past year. This indicates Habib may have a psychological edge in matches extending to the wire. Additionally, in terms of breakpoint conversion, Brunold leads with 28.65% success, overshadowing Habib's 25% conversion rate—a potential insight for live betting opportunities.

With these considerations and statistics, the comparative analysis indicates a competitive clash. However, given Habib's stronger performance under pressure, greater experience against higher-level opponents, and resilience in deciding sets, the prediction leans toward Habib clinching the victory in this anticipated matchup.